Archive for September 14th, 2025

A mere mortal club player always in a muddle or worse over the board, am I meant to know how to weave a mating net in this position? Even if I did study endgames often, would I see it? Probably not. According to GM Nunn in his book detailed below, the move played is the only winning move. I am not good enough to consider how important the king position can be in such endgames and how it can be decisive also but then I am allergic to going more than 4 or 5 moves deep!

White plays 59. Kd3 here.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1125480

You can find analysis of this position in GM Nunn’s Understanding Chess Endgames, pg. 40.

M J M

Read Full Post »

Soviet chess and Bondarevsky plays a move against Panov I could not play. The queen and two minor pieces are on the queenside and white appears to have control over many squares on the kingside, so making a sac work on that side of the board feels counter-intuitive and inadvisable. But work it does with deep calculation and another sac to follow. Not easy to see how so.

Black plays 16. … Bxh3 here.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1411384

Analysis of this game can be found in this publication.

M J M

Read Full Post »

Having to refine my reading habits more and more these days, choosing only the choicest on-line content whatever the cost may be. I noted earlier today that my all time favourite player -GM Carlsen- found himself in a highly unusual ending against GM Firouzja last week and chased it up in The Times.

In his column GM Howell gives us good reason to want to watch chess on-line.

You can read the whole article by subscribing to The Times, it’s much less expensive than you may think. https://www.thetimes.com/

M J M

Read Full Post »

With regards to the publication below, which I bought decades ago, I’ve always had a strong admiration for Tolush. He was Spassky’s trainer, and his style of play is so reckless at times, as you will see below should you click on the link provided. I’m not a 1. d4 player but I know enough about The Trompowsky to say with some confidence that if you play it, and your queenside collaspes completely, and most of the kingside has been left undeveloped whilst your king gets chased half way up the board, perhaps you didn’t gain much of an advantage out of the opening! When you resign on move 26, that’s often the case. I couldn’t play the move below because my assessment is based more on evaluation than calculation and I am not brave enough to play such moves. How can he justify allowing 9. Nxc2+? Very brave indeed or failing that miscalculated-hard for me to tell. You may want to play through the game, many over the years have as it’s quite something.

White plays 9. Be5 here!

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1270161

M J M

Read Full Post »

On pg. 101 in his excellent book The Soviet Championships B. Cafferty comments that the move below requires deep analysis. Far too deep for me and almost everyone else below 2600 ELO I would imagine. Sacrifices with long-term compensation are above my level I don’t mind admitting. I do not know how white is meant to proceed after the annotated move below.

White plays 12. Nc6 here.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1072785,

M J M

Read Full Post »

More than one interpretation

Take a look at the theorem below and decide how it should be interpreted:

England always beats France at chess

France always beats Spain at chess

Spain always beats England at chess

What are you leaning towards? Falsehood? Consistency? Recursion?

Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, Douglas. R. Hofstadter, pg.103

M J M

Read Full Post »

I’ve never sacced a queen in my life! So what are the chances of the likes of me playing the move below? Yes, there’s some immediate compensation but not enough and the win is from from easy. Another 13 moves are played before GM Miles resigns with mate imminent. A fine game by Bedfordshire’s GM Plaskett, considered his best.

Here GM Plaskett plays 19. Nxe4

Read Full Post »