Archive for the ‘Chess’ Category

When I look back on how I played chess in my youth, there is nothing that impresses me about it -nothing at all. Apart from everything else, I just didn’t take it seriously enough. With regards to my opening repertoire, around 1991/1992 I found the Sicilian defence to be a source of much frustration and didn’t quite know what to do against it. And so in 1992 I made the leap from 1. e4 to 1. f4, which I became noted for. Looking back there was a lot wrong with that decision. 1. f4 is a poor opening move and is at best drawish. It never really occurred to me to think about the consequences of consciously choosing something drawish. But more importantly, it lead to great inflexibility in my chess because white invariably goes for a similar set up every time with the intent of keeping the centre closed for attacks on the kingside. It also didn’t occur to me to think about the consequences of playing the same way all the time and the impact that would have on my game overall. Nor did it enter my head to stop and evaluate the type of position I often ended up with (usually closed). And it was only 2 or 3 years later that I started experimenting with move order and changing things up that I got any kind of handle on it. The problem is here that in every game the position changes and flexibility is the key. Trying to force a certain type of win is never a good way to play but that’s the way it went. My decision making process exuded amateurism and I certainly am not the only one to evade opening theory with opening moves lacking in credibility. But the bottom line is that a change from 1. e4 to 1. f4 really is bad and it’s far better to just stick it out and delve further into opening theory. That I never did, I was kinda afraid of it. Silly me.

Read Full Post »

Her beauty is beguiling

Social media means so much to some yet so little to others: often dependant on age as well as various other factors. But no matter what you make of it, or don’t make of it, as viewers we are spoilt for choice on what to watch. Ever since The Queen’s Gambit became the number one show on Netflix, we have seen an upsurge of young girls posting social media of them playing chess. Youtube, Instagram, Twitch, and Twitter have all become home to some very pretty females strutting their stuff. And so enter akanemsko on youtube. She’s got her own channel and its quite something. Incredibly pretty, eloquent, well-mannered, very sexy indeed, and good at chess -what more could you ask for in a woman?

Here she is playing the famous ‘Russian Paul’ of NYC and beating him.

The big question is, of course, if you were coupled up with this babe, would you ever make it out of bed?

Read Full Post »

Pan-din-wai strikes!

Pan-din-wai is the Thai word for earthquake. It has been reported that an earthquake of 4.2 on the Richter Scale struck just to the east of Chiang Mai, where the current Bangkok Open is being held. It stuck last Thursday, on the eve of the tournament – a welcome introduction. Details can be found here: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000iuyr/executive

The EARTH SHAKER has spoken.

Read Full Post »

I’ve decided to stop playing chess online. Two bad habits are taking hold and turning my play into something of a joke, so I have stopped. I feel much better for it somehow. A righteous path has been chosen or so it feels. All that is left is to do nothing. Shouldn’t be too hard… .

Read Full Post »

Habituation and online chess

I’ve noticed recently that I am playing too much chess on line and that a lot of it is poor. I’ve had to think about why that is and I have noticed two things in particular, both of which spring from the fact that online chess isn’t taken very seriously, generally speaking and myself included.

  1. I’ve noticed I have fallen into the habit of playing bad moves, mostly because the result of the game isn’t so important and also because of point number two.
  2. I have become used to bad moves being played against me. This causes me to stop trying so hard, then I make mistakes myself.

Overall, it’s not good and doesn’t lend itself to playing with any sense of pride. A quick game online here and there to fill in the time isn’t for the best, and so it’s something I shall put a stop to soon. That is for the best.

MJM

Read Full Post »

It could be the case that a pleasant, if long, train journey to what is my favourite place in Thailand, for nine days of chess, where I get to meet up with old friends is the sort of thing that dreams are made of. The sort of thing that makes holidaying all the worth while. Afterall, who wouldn’t want to go off travelling to play some chess. Stands to reason doesn’t it? But that might only be true if impulses are at the heart of our decision making process. But you do have to be in the right frame of mind and that’s just not the case with myself. I have to pass up the opportunity, and its for the best. I’m too wounded to limp on. So I shall stay at home and spend time with my well-loved child instead. It’s helpful to remember that chess isn’t that important, and sometimes circumstances prevent it from ever being so.

Read Full Post »

How do we assess our current level? It’s an inexact science but nonetheless correlated to how often we play. I think rustiness is defined in terms of being out of the game for some time. But if we aren’t rusty per se and we aren’t playing regularly enough, how do we define where we are, and thus, what we are capable of? Just how do we measure by graduation and what exactly is the criteria being used. We have a few expressions which readdress the matter but mostly they are colloquial and are a bit vague. It seems to me that assessing where you are at with your chess is not as straightforward as it may first appear. I’m not talking about competitive chess here, instead I am taking about approximate level. Lack of match practice is a separate issue.

We all like to know where we are with things but it seems we must stick to generalities as knowing exactly where you are isn’t so simple. I play online quite a lot but never take it seriously, as is so often the case. How much does that count for? Hard to be sure. I don’t know how useful it is to dichotomize chess into online and OTB, and perhaps it is the case OTB chess carries with it certain things which online chess cannot but establishing the seriousness of your online play and using that as a yardstick to gain some idea of overall level is far from straightforward. Form should, in itself, be transient but what the conditions are for the development of form, or improvement to put is simply, are unclear. Detachment doesn’ t lend itself to explication and most likely we never are well aware of what shape we are in. The question is why should it matter, and the answer to that might just be down to a manifestation of guilt through not trying hard enough with online chess. In all probability attachment to a club or institute of some kind will embed experience with more definitive results and participation. The bigger questions determine to what extent life is being led properly. Life led in some quandary zone, never being neither here nor there doesn’t sound quite right to me. Nor does looking for answers to issues to help plan things more carefully.

If there is a solution then it lies with objectification. Go to tournaments, win some games, climb up ladders, and so on. Basically, don’t sit around doing nothing anymore and wonder what it’s left me with, and instead be active. Whatever the solution may be, it lies in that direction I would say.

Read Full Post »

Going nowhere fast

A principal quality to becoming a strong chess player is pattern recognition and it has much value beyond the board too.

And so the upshot is I am less excited about a return to OTB chess. Why? I’ve been here before too many times. There’s nothing new about it and too much that is familiar. It’s tempting to think I go round in circles. Even if I don’t, the truth of the matter is not too far off. I seem to be quite good at putting my foot in it (reckless bugger), and so the sense of familiarity is too strong and enthusiasm somewhat lacking this time around.

There is a transition in play when you go from online to OTB. Etiquette comes back into play, the sense of occasion over-arches all. The games come thick and fast in BKK chess club because they only play blitz there. There’s also nearly 2 hours of travel to the chess club. It’s a welcome transition but it has to be remembered that chess is just a board game and there are far more important things in life to be getting on with. Well, admittedly chess is a passion too and that does elevate its status.

General considerations should never be overlooked and so, owing to circumstances, I might not be too up for it. Hard to be sure.

Read Full Post »

Pity the pawns

Bangkok almost

Read Full Post »

It’s highly likely that I will be able to play in a 9 round tournament this month if I want to. I don’t want to though. I’m too rusty amongst other reasons. It doesn’t help being cursed by an artificially low rating as well. I suppose we have to be informed enough to know when its a good idea to play and not a good idea. It takes 7 rounds for me to get into the groove sufficiently, and that’s just too much. It’s just not possible to enjoy the tournament when most of it is spent in a state of unreadiness. Perhaps I will take the train up and spend a day or two watching games and catching up with old friends…that might be better.

The frontage from such decisions don’t really help decide where the balance of importance is going to lie in terms of playing on-line and playing down the club. It seems stupendous to suggest that my off line life may overtake my on line life but you never know. In retrospect there is, of course, no comparison between OTB chess and online chess. The caveat is, though, with OTB you get those who suffer from NBPE syndrome (not been punched enough) and they can be bloody annoying gits if they want to be…ah yeah, there is that I suppose…

Mark

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »