‘…most information about the past has never been recorded and most of the rest was evanescent…no account of the past can recover the past because the past was not an account but events, situations, etc. As the past has gone no account can ever be checked against it but only against other accounts….there is no proper history that, deep down, allows us to check all other accounts against it, there is no fundamentally correct text which other interpretations are just variations; variations are all there are…no matter how verifiable, how widely accepted or checkable, history remains inevitably a personal construct, the manifestation of the historian’s perspective as a narrative…the historians viewpoint and predilections will shape the choice of historical materials…’
K. Jenkins, Re-thinking History pg. 14
The Southern Counties Chess Union – a retrospective, pg. 135 Anthony Fulton
This concise summarization concerning the formation of our county association comes from the 1933 publication ‘Chess in Bedfordshire’ thus is consistent with it. You can find it here1. And although some mention of club matches are made in the following pages of Fulton’s publication, and their rather sporadic ad-hoc nature eluded to, it does not delve further into them, and does not discuss the historical significance they may, or may not, have had before our league established itself, and our own league was put into play. But I have already done that with a certain match in particular2. I do, however, have minor corrections to add. Since I wrote that post, I have more concrete evidence of Ward’s birthplace and baptism.
The date of his baptism.
The census from 1871 shows he was still in Abbots Langley. In the following censes he can be found in King’s Langley, just outside Luton. In the 1891 census he is still in King’s Langley and in the 1901 census, he is shown as a resident of Luton. (many thanks to Richard James for his assistance)
It is clearly documented in the footnote above that Major Harry Duhan of Bedford went on to become the champion of South Africa, which was reported in the British Chess Magazine that year (as linked above), his games are illustrated too (as shown above). More about his life can be found here3. This achievement is significant for our purposes because it exemplifies the first instance of a Bedfordshire based player achieving documented international success. Regarding the match in question, he suffered a 0-2 loss to Ward of Luton. But why was he beaten in both games? What did he losses tell us about his opponent?
Although we could begin with something trite like: Ward, who occasionally played for Luton, finished 3rd in the British Championships in 1905, second in 1908, then 3rd in 1909 as well as become the champion of the City of London chess club 6 times between 1902-1911, West London chess club in 1907 and champion of Middlesex in 1909 when it was the strongest county across our sceptred isle. -this antiquated approach simply won’t do4.
Yes the paragraph above is well corroborated but more importantly it is synchronic. Firstly, it is necessary to corroborate our own claims further and enter into discourse about them. I am not the only person to have written about William Ward. Author Richard James has done so too. You may find the links to his work here5. We are clearly in agreement that William Ward lived in and around Luton, where his family moved to, although where we differ is that author James gives a more compelling account of how transient his life was, it should also be noted that James does not show Ward did in fact play for Luton where as I have shown he did play at least twice, and in all probability, many undocumented times more since he was based outside the town for a small part of his life. Ward achieved almost all his success some years after in London. Prior to that there are pertinent questions to be answered, such as ‘How strong was Ward when he defeated Duhan in our league in 1896?’ This question is problematic because the ‘evidence’ pertaining to his ability then is rather depressing without gamescores. Yes two years’ later he did become joint champion of the S.C.C.U as James clearly illustrates. And we also have material we can utilize for narrative purposes to construct a strong argument as to why. If we embrace the entrusted EDO Historical Chess Rating site, which is generally considered reliable, then we can indeed find Mr. William Ward placed at number 131 in the world in 1896, with an estimated rating of 2315 and then in 1898 with an estimated rating of 2360, still keeping him ahead of future world champion Capablanca by some 56 rankings. In today’s market that would put him at FM level. His opponent, Harry Duhan (later to be known as Major Harry Duhan or Major Duhan) does not appear in the estimated ratings of that year but can be found for the years 1910-1912. How reliable this can be some 14-16 years after they played is difficult to be sure of but if you play through Duhan’s games in the link concerning a clash of future champions, they suggest to me he was not equipped to compete against someone of Ward’s caliber. Why do I say this? Because, as stated by historian and celebrated author Dr. Timothy Harding, there is evidence that in December 1897 he participated in the Yorkshire v City of London Chess Club match by telephone. This is significant for our purposes because the City of London Chess Club was the biggest in the country at the time, some of its members were world class. How could Ward represent the largest club in the country so soon if he was not already very strong? A group photo with him in it can be found below.
Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography by Dr. Tim Harding, pg. 375
By 1900 Ward had established himself as a strong amateur in London and was selected for the Anglo-American cable matches. He was also invited to participate in the City of London Tournament, where a select few of the world’s best were pitted against some of the best amateurs on our shores6. Details of this can be found here 7. As you can see, Ward not only drew with Mason but beat Blackburne and finished above him in the tournament. The following year he was pushed up the team in the Anglo-American cable match from board 9 to board 7 and beat Frank Marshall too, making him the first documented Bedfordshire based player to beat world class opposition. His retrospective rating for 1901 was 2372, making him 86th in the world, placing him above future world champion Capablanca (2359).8. His draw against Mason and victories against Blackburne and Marshall can be found below. Only now can we see why Ward went on to nearly win the British Championship on more than one occasion before the decade was out! In 1904 he had an estimated rating of 2414 and was rated as 60th in the world, ahead of many more famous than him, such as Isidor Gunsberg, Eugene Znosko-Borovsky, Karel Treybal, and Dawid Przepiórka.
‘A historical narrative is thus necessarily a mixture of adequately and inadequately explained events, a congeries of established and inferred facts, at once a representation that is an interpretation and an interpretation that passes for an explanation of the whole process mirrored in the narrative.’
Hayden White, Interpretation in History, pg. 1
William Ward
The draw against Mason, City of London Club Invitational, April 20th 1900, Round 6
‘It is dates, he (Claude Levi-Strauss) says, which justify the historian’s search for “temporal relationships” and sanction the conceptualization of events in terms of “the relation of before and after.’ Hayden White, Interpretation in History, pg. 289
My dear fellow countymen, to continue with Levi-Strauss, ‘history is never history…but history-for’. For our purposes, I have constructed a narrative which shows William Ward played chess in Bedfordshire in his early years and had multiple successes thereafter in London. He was the first to encounter and beat world class opposition, or masters as they were known back then, shortly after his time in Bedfordshire. Although Ward’s most noted achievements came nine years and more after he left our county, I have chosen to focus on his performances before as they give us a clearer indication of his ability around the time he left our county.
I am not some forlorn devotee of Leopold Ranke who wishes to bang on about ‘the facts, the facts, the facts’ so I can tell it ‘the way it really was’. It’s not the 1860s anymore, it is presently 2023, and we have already encountered Hegel, Droysen, Nietzsche, and Croce to name but a few who revolted against the movement Ranke once found himself at the centre of. As Camus once said ‘Purely historical thought is nihilistic’. ↩︎
Television has a role in modern western society which is being decentralized by the internet and the so called digital revolution we are, apparently, undergoing.
Nonetheless, important it remains and compelling it may be too…especially when Bedfordshire’s finest chess players appear on it. Who might they be and what was that all about then?
1 (The man who failed to beat me with the King’s Indian Attack)
The first was Bedford’s Dave Ledger, who appeared on the Channel 4 daytime show Countdown around 1993 (apologies for my imprecision). I did ask him about his experience on the show once, and he informed me that it (Countdown) was far less glamorous than it appears on tv! Dave did win on his debut it, I remember watching him, and gave a good account of himself. https://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_1571 . It is also claimed that Dave appeared on a show called Brainteaser but I have no evidence of this.
2 (The man who dismantled my Bird’s opening far too quickly)
Staying with Bedford, second was Paul Habershon, who also appeared on countdown some eleven years later, and like Dave, won in the first but lost in the second show. Further information can be be found on the Countdown Wiki here. https://wiki.apterous.org/Paul_Habershon
3 (The man I never met over the board)
Third in line was Bedford’s James Plaskett, who famously appeared on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire in 2006, and in all probability, won more money on a gameshow than any other chess player in history.
4 (The man once rated 200+ who once saw me off with with his Catalan)
Forth comes Dunstable & Luton’s Colin Garwood, who recently appeared on University Challenge and did rather well for himself.
5
The exclusion of the fifth element! Mr. M. J. McCready once appeared as an extra in the film Whoops Apocalypse in 1986, and then appeared on tv many times thereafter in the crowd at Luton Town football club. I’ve also appeared on tv in Saudi Arabia and Azerbaijan. But I’m not linking any of that nor should I include myself. All appearances were fleeting and I never said very much. Additionally, I’m both shy and rubbish at chess, which makes my inclusion rather unnecessary and quite unjustifiable!
Don’t ask me how but one of the two games I played for Luton whilst in recovery from my main accident, where I fractured my skull alongside a great very many other vicissitudes has been found, and here it is. I do remember the game, and do remember delivering mate.
And in case you can’t read it, here it is:
Mark.J.McCready
Shamal Mohammed
24/11/16 OU v Kents/Luton
e4 e6
d4 d5
Nd2 c5
ce Nc6
Nf3 Qb6 This is an antiquated move which I played because I forgot the theory. Qb6 was premature, the queen should never be moved so early in the French Defence.
exd5 cxd5
Nb3 Bg4
dxc5 Bxc5
Nxc5 Qxc5
Be3 Qd6
Be2 Nf6
0-0 0-0
Nd4 Bxe2
Qxe2 Nxd4
Bxd4 Rfe8 This is precisely what I aimed for. Mostly inspired by Capablanca in my youth who blockaded an IQP with a bishop in one of his famous games. Normally this is done with the knight and not the bishop.
Qb5 Ng4 I found black’s last move to be strange, the cheap threat is very easily countered.
g3 Qh6
h4 Qh5 Black needs more pieces in attack to make this work. There is no threat here.
Rae1 f6. I understood it but thought it was not the best move in the position.
c4 Ne5
Qxd5 Kh8
Bxe5 Rxe5
Rxe5 Qxe5
Qxb7 Rb8
Qxa7 Qxb2 It was better to take with the rook I thought and was surprised by this.
c5 Rc8
Qa6 Rg8 After this was played I knew I would win.
c6 g5
c7 Qc3
hxg5 fxg5
Qd6 h5 The fatal blunder.
Qh6 mate. Believe it or not it took a second or two to register but then I had not long been out of hospital from a head injury and was not yet fully functional.
Clearly it is the case that a break from chess is long overdue, should such a thing indeed be possible?
With online chess banished, what do I do with OTB chess? OTB chess carries a sense of occasion which factors in social elements. Given that I am soon to relocate, and am keen to make new friends, is a break from OTB chess justifiable? Do I resign myself to being just a spectator, should I find a chess club where I am relocating too in the hope of gaining friends and acquaintances? Can’t I just limit the amount I play instead? What is more important? The social or competitive aspect of chess for me? Is a break a necessity or merely a preference? Is my judgment sound or poor? Why so many questions over something relativity insignificant?
Because it is contentment not improvement that is in play here; therefore, the social dimension of chess is significant, and to be factored in.
Whether anything will come about I don’t know. I’m more impulsive than I am rational. Not only am I far from your archetypal chess player, I’m also a lazy sod and a lazy git as well as being both shy and anti-social.
Of this there is no doubt: you will hear about it one way or another and quite soon.
“Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants.” ― Epictetus
That atemporal stranger in a strange land -myself in Eastbourne- outright refused to go to the chess club tonight and vowed to never go down that empty lane again. Eastbourne? Yes Eastbourne, the quiet-city-by-the-sea, the city that is not only a noticeable improvement form Luton but is also kinda dead, kinda unable to respond to being Brighton’s smaller brother. I only played one game of chess last weekend -in London not Eastbourne- and that was enough to tell me that a break is long overdue.
So today I said to myself, ‘just say no’.…British people who, like moi‘, grew up watching Grange Hill in the 80s may have bells ringing here. They may say ‘but that song was about stopping doing drugs’ well chess is a drug, well kinda… .
I don’t watch live chess anymore. Isn’t it tiresome and depressing just? I stopped playing on-line altogether and for good, and there’s no more OTB chess planned anytime soon… .
Yesterday I had a plan. That plan was to take the skytrain and enter the city. Stop off at my favourite Indian restaurant for a vegetable curry. Get back on the skytrain and go to my hospital for my medication (I have hypermania), then go to the chess club. But that way go it did not. Within minutes of getting on the skytrain I fell critically ill. My whole world collapsed around me because the week before (subject of The visit that never was) I suffered so immensely from my life being threatened that I have been in a state of near collapse ever since. All I could do was hang on for dear life on the skytrain, try my hardest to walk to the hospital, collect my medication, and go back home. It was not very pleasant to arrive at the station I was supposed to get off to go to the chess club and then watch it go by but I had no choice, I was so sick mentally. By the time I got home, it wasn’t even 7pm but I had to fall into bed immediately and lie still all night long. Being the true hypermaniac that I am, of course sleep was not possible, and yes of course it’s not possible tonight also and no it won’t be possible tomorrow night either but these are trivialities. Like I said in the previous post, when your life is close to being taken away from you, you aren’t going to like it and you aren’t going to know what to do. What I didn’t say was it’s not something you can just walk away from and expect to be as right as rain the next day either. And what I couldn’t say was how sure I was of what was happening around me. Was I so startled that I couldn’t see things straight? The answers are coming, the answers are coming, a conclusion will be created… .
Yesterday, I didn’t have the power to play chess. I felt so wounded. I felt confused. I just wanted to go home, close my eyes and make everything go away. I could not speak to anyone, not even my own daughter. All I could do was lie still for many hours, not even hoping that my wounds would heal. I cannot put into words how hurt I have been and if that isn’t bad enough I must wait weeks before I can learn if I have been left with a terminal illness too, one which will eventually destroy my immune system and take my life from me.
Mark. J. McCready, 02.13 am, Sunday April 30th 2023
A quiet and lonely place where I have cried most days this week, Laksi, Bangkok.
Next Friday I will go to play in a blitz tournament at Bangkok Chess Club. Next Saturday I will play in a Rapid Tournament. Next Sunday I will play in another rapid tournament in the city. Triple whammy in play.
…on what this site initially became…on what this site is now becoming…on what this site cannot become…
On what this site initially became…
…once upon a time, the chess-related musings of an adrift academic were bound playfully and electronically in this online journal of sorts. They grew and grew as the decade did too. I kept on because I love to write whether I had much to say or not; therefore, being read by others was usually of little or no importance, comparatively speaking. Content was based on personal thoughts and experience on various topics with no intended audience borne in mind. With topics broadening, my own take on things always shaped the narrative I constructed: I often thought I was insightful but never that I was right. Sometimes imagination gave rise to originality: and of that I have always remained proud. I often introduced humour, believing that I am funnier than I really am. Sometimes, I found my own style antithetical to the conservatism I believe chess is plagued by -oftentimes that has put a gracious smile on my face… .
On what this site is now becoming…
…this site is now becoming a collaboration of chess in Bedfordshire: much more so of the past than the present -that has become the dominant trend. I document the history of chess in Bedfordshire as much as I can, and as time has passed I have become more thorough and resourceful. However, I am not a trained historian as my background lies principally in philosophy but yes it is true I did study some modules on history as both an undergraduate and a post-graduate too; furthermore, I have trained myself up, particularly in terms of postmodern history. Since 2015, I have only read history and historiography as well as those philosophers who have been so influential on postmodern history, such as Nietzsche (whom I once wrote a 19,000 word dissertation on, entitled: Can the Will to Power be Found in The Birth of Tragedy?), also Richard Rorty and Foucault and I suppose certain structualists such as Claude Levi-Strauss too. Regarding postmodernism, mostly I keep to Hayden White, Keith Jenkins and Alan Muslow.
Some friends and former playing partners back home describe me as the ‘go to guy’ for the history of chess in Bedfordshire. This compliment says more about the lack of interest in the subject than my own endeavour. As mentioned, I am too adrift from academia to feel chuffed. Rather. I tend to lament that my historical research, like my chess, just isn’t what it should be. Even though I may well have a broad understanding of Bedfordshire chess history courtesy of the volume of research put into it, all of which began in 2014, this is not something I am particularly proud of. Nonetheless, out of courtesy compliments are graciously received. If the truth be told, I just see it as my job and only that – after all someone’s got to do it and no one else is that interested!
Amongst the many others, I have created three categories: ‘Bedfordshire Chess’ and ‘History of Bedfordshire Chess’ and ‘Luton Chess Club’. This website is slowly moving towards a consolidation of those (all of which can be found in one of the toolbars to the right).
On what this site cannot become…
…I like to be both creative and amusing when I can be, factor in that playfulness has been an ever-present factor, the content of this site should be thought of as multifarious. It could be said I continue to enjoy undermining the conservatism I believe chess is underpinned by even after all these years, and often try to use humour to do it still, believing I have got better at it. Consequently, despite the general direction its going in, this site cannot only be about Chess in Bedfordshire and nor will it be. It may become noted for that yes -in fact that’s been the case for years already even by established historians, archivists, and whoever else. External factors aside, this site is titled McCreadyandChess. I cannot, nor will I not, remove my own personal thoughts and experiences of chess from the posts of this site -especially if I think they are funny or original for they constitute my writing at its very, very best. In addition, the number of categories alone tells you that breadth of content is important to me. I am proud of my site, it is identity conferring and that is how it shall stay -end of story. All you really have are: ‘Some thoughts on the beautiful game’, which, incidentally, just happen to be my very own; nothing more, nothing less, take of it whatever you please… .
A side note on how to read old Tom Sweby's columns
Not perhaps, but quintessentially, Old Tom Sweby is best thought of as a passionate devotee to the newspapers he wrote for. He was well read and knowledgeable of the Bedfordshire chess scene and well beyond, given that he was the president of the S.C.C.U. once upon a time. He was generally well-respected and rubbed shoulders with many, if not all, of those eminent within British chess circles. It would, however, be a critical mistake to see his column is primary source material entirely. That it is not. You will also find secondary source material quoted too, and the reliability of that is not quite as Tom hoped. Given that he wrote for decades, this is to some degree inevitable, and after all we are all prone to error whether we realize it or not. Thankfully, with regards to old Tom Sweby, they are infrequent and for the most part old Tom continued to document events and developments in the Bedfordshire league from the get go as best he could but, of course, everything lies open to interpretation. Despite this, and generally speaking. this does indeed make him informative and thus worth reading. Dare I say his columns constitute a narrative describing the latest developments, match reports and changing nature of the Beds league...he knew his audience and wrote according. This manifested itself over decades but brevity was always in play courtesy of the restictions imposed by writing a column. Should you wish to read a in instrumental figure of the Beds' league post WW2, you are quite welcome to peruse what has been posted here... . :-) I should, however, point out that as the decades wore on he gradually moved on away from narratives concerning the Bedfordshire league towards affairs both historical and international. The reasons for this are multifarous, old age was a predominante factor presumably, however, the bottom line is with regards to how the Bedfordshire chess scene developed post WW2: old Tom Sweby is your go to guy. He wrote more about chess in Bedforshire than anyone else did but given he was a Lutonian and writing for a Luton newspaper there is both bias and greater coverage of his hometown than the rest of the county.
Gallery
I’m either 10 or 11 here
1982, myself versus Brian from Sunderland.
At the Thai Junior chess championships. My daughter of course.
Pattaya 2011
2011
Thai Junior Championships
2008
2011
Around 2011
2011
Pattaya 2009
2011
Kuwait 2008
2012
2012
2011 BKK Chess club
2011
2011 Thai Open
2011 Thai Open
2013 approx
Around 2014
2010
2012
Around 2011
2011
2011
2013
Around 2011
Around 2011
2020
2011
2008
2011
2013 or thereabouts
2010
2017
2014?
2010
2024
2024
2024
To add comments, please see the bell at the top of the page.