Reflections 4

On Saturday, December 12th 2009, I decided to go along to the first London Chess Classic and watch Round 4 unfold. Even with the temperature barely above zero, it was a pleasant journey to Kensington Olympia Conference centre, being my first time there since I competed at Othello in the 1999 Mind Sports Olympiad (details of which can be found here: https://www.studiogiochi.com/files/studiogiochi.com/2018/07/MSO-1999-Brochure.pdf. Although I played alongside the current world champion (Murakami Takeshi) back then, who was of course Japanese, it was in fact Dennis Hassabis who won that event as I recalled, alongside many contiguous positive memories which carried me there.

Upon entering the event, I had to buy a ticket in the lobby, a huge spectacle itself and full of children and parents playing in the lobby on giant sized chess sets: it was a hub of activity with children of all ages running around and having fun. Inside the playing hall it was, of course a much quieter affair, and amongst the games being played, the one I took interest in the most, being a French Defence player for so long, was this one: https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1565727.

Things that stood out which are worth recording:

1. I had already been working overseas for a decade and was only back in England to undertake a Masters Degree. I was not yet used to being back in blighty and snowed under with academia. But the whole thing; being in England, taking the train to London, going to watch some chess, fond memories of the location, felt like a trip down memory line if anything.

2. Whilst in the auditorium where the Masters played I saw GM Magnus Carlsen for the one and only time, well before play begun as I had arrived rather early. I then spent time reminiscing about my time there ten years previously and how a close friend and former playing partner Nick McBride bumped into me and introduced himself with a big smile on his face, telling me his name and who he used to play chess for, assuming I must have forgotten who he was. Nick and I both played chess for Luton in the 80s and 90s and draughts for England once down in Weymouth. Info provided by Draughts IM Dennis Pawlek, author of the following site. https://startcheckers.com/

Not the most impressive debut by me.

In the chess section I remembered seeing a young David Howell defeat GM John Nunn, who stormed out upon defeat and pushed past many in the process, myself included. In the Cribbage section, I saw Bedford’s Ledger brothers (Dave & Andy) playing together in the doubles section. In the draughts section, Nick showed me who the big stars were, the main one being Ron King. I always remember lots of players from Bahrain participating. I saw GM Nick Pert there too, who I once played against in Hitchin and drew with when he was younger.

3. When not reminiscing, I felt heavily encumbered by the research I had to conduct that month, finding theories of vision and perception proposed in the 70’s tough to eschew and even tougher to digest. This set the tone for most of the day, and if truth be told, it wasn’t the greatest of days, as put – I was snowed under.

4. I found the Masters section rather boring and decided to wander around at some point. In doing so, I also saw GM Korchnoi for the first and only time. Being 78 then, he had quite some dificulty walking and had to use a cane to do so. I saw him expect someone to open a door for him…let’s just say his lack of manners was less than impressive and leave it there.

5. A major section was played also, and I spend quite some time there as much more chess going on. One player caught me by surprise, I thought something was wrong as she couldn’t possibly be a chess player even though she was playing on quite a high board. I went up to her table out of curiosity and some disbelief too. She picked up on this and got up out of her chair. It was WFM Arianne Caoli. I did not know who she was back then and thought she must be a model who just wanted to take part or something, and not a chess player, which the card by the table confirmed she was. As you may know, she went on to marry GM Lev Aronian before tragically losing her life in a car accident in his home nation Armenia. Never in my life have I seen someone so beautiful play chess. But not wanting to disturb her or anyone else for that matter, I continued to circulate.

The once highly sought after WFM Arianne Caoili.

Not too long after, and long before play finished, I wandered off towards the tube and back home I went. Upon reflection, I liked the nostalgic feel the day had but was so under the kosh from the Master’s Degree I was taking, it wasn’t possible to enjoy the spectacle I beheld. It was a short break from studies and not too much else really. I must have told many about it all though as Andy Perkins from Luton chess club came up to me months later and wanted to know more about it.

MJM, Latin America

‘When we discipline our conscience, it kisses us while it bites’ Nietzsche, Epigrams and entr’actes 99, BGE

Did you know that the first person ever to receive a brilliancy prize was an Englishman or so it is argued? None other than H. E. Bird, he who is more commonly associated with openings and defences considered to be more so quaint than modern. I am not a trained historian and so cannot document the precise reasons why brilliancy prizes emerged when they did, however, I can show a position from the game in question and link it too, as it is rather impressive I must say.

Here, Bird plays 31. Ra6 (frowned upon by modern engines however I should add)

The game itself can be found here, https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1027995&kpage=2. One would naturally assume that should you want to understand why H. E. Bird won the prize given, you should at least look at the game. Further understanding can be found in Hooper & Whylde’s Oxford Companion to Chess, pg. 49

I do believe this has been documented further in: CN 1062 Edward Winter, “Chess Explorations”, Cadogan 1996. The chat below the game linked also cites the following:

Obviously I am not the first to post about this and nor will I be the last, a more comprehensive, if less motivated by patriotism, post can be found here: https://www.chess.com/article/view/first-brilliancy-prizes

More on patriotism, I visited this tournament but not this round where GM Mc Shane won the first brilliancy prize of The London Chess Classic.

Regarding prizes per se, a more comprehensive historical account can be found here: https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/prizes.html

Explore further as you so wish. If I find further relevant research, I shall post it below.

MJM, South America

Reflections 3

Associating a place with chess and feeling ambivalent towards it is quite natural in my opinion well for we club and county players that is… .

Portsmouth: in 1992, we had a student from Portsmouth join Kents/Luton Chess Club, his name was James Taylor and he was rated 135. We both played for the county and got on like a house on fire, being the same sort of age and so on. In the winter of 1993, a tournament was held in Southsea where his family home was. I agree to stay there with him and play in the tournament also. I then persuaded several other members from my club to enter also. And so, on a cold afternoon with light snow that February day, we all drove down in D. Cruz’s black panther.

J. Taylor’s family home was warm and welcoming even though I turned up wearing clothes only those well into grunge wore.

Nirvana
Taken a month or so before. I wore that scarf to the tournament, the jacket also, and often wore that T-shirt. The band is Ministry.

It was the first time ever I played in a 6-round swiss, with the first game on the Friday night, three games on the Saturday and the final two rounds on the Sunday. I entered the Major section, which was an U-170.

That year I became much more solid as a player and became tough to beat. This was exemplified in the first two games, both of which I drew despite being on the backfoot throughout both, against opponents rated 200 ELO points above me. But the second draw was particularly tough. Our driver down saw how I went wrong in the opening and assumed it was completely lost. I similar thing occurred in the third game, after which not being a tournament player anyway caught up with me, and I went on to lose my next two games without really trying, only to win my final game, leaving me with 2.5 out of 6.

What stood out above all was not the chess though, it was the experience on the whole, which was very pleasant indeed. Memories are put in chronological order except the last one:

  1. I loved the clear, crisp, icy cold weather with very light snow being blown about on the pavements in low winter light.
  2. Being complimented by my opponent in Round 1 for my strong defensive skills.
  3. Being made breakfast by and having it with James’s family at the start of day 2 on a rather posh avenue somewhere in SouthSea.
  4. Being offered a draw by a panicky opponent in round two after I established decent counterplay in a position that had been lost for some time.
  5. Seeing some girl wearing grunge clothes with a long white dress and heavy black DM boots in the tournament hall and sat down for hours often read novels by herself. She certainly caught my eye.
  6. Bumping into fellow Bedfordshire league player, the Scotsman Tom Matko, who used to play for Cranfield, who played 1. f4 like I did back then, and against who I had many hair-raising draws. We then went for a walk along the seafront on the final day. He bought a Yorkie bar at an off-licence and explained that he rarely ate chocolate as he trained to run in marathons frequently. I really liked him and enjoyed our walk along Southsea Castle, despite the bitterly cold wind.
  7. The least pleasant memory has nothing to do with the fact that after three games I lost interest but that one evening in Damon’s car, we got some pizza and ate it in his car. I burnt the top of my mouth on mine badly.

Chess & Football: Portsmouth. At the beginning of the 2008/2009 season, Luton were away to Portsmouth on Aug 4th, and I went to the match. We lost 1-0 but should have won. Siting in the chair behind me was former Luton Chess Club member Ken Grogan. Two photos I took from where I was sitting.

MJM, Colombia

If you delve into chess played back in Victorian times -to use an English term- more work is involved than you may think: some would argue the further back in time you go the more cumulative this becomes. Not yet aghast? You may even discover that sometimes a spiffing Englishman come up against a chap from a former colony of ours and gets a tonking over the board -just imagine that!

In those heady days chess was bereft of ratings and titles only categories were used for classification; differing among nations in terms of criterion and meaning since they weren’t universal and subject to revision and misreportage also.

Today, some just go on the name of a player alone just to estimate their strength. But of course you can always compare ability by matching up these greats of the past. Look at the example below to see what I mean. Let’s look at a position and ponder a move first before playing through the game.

Bird has just played 17. 0-0-0. Look okay to you?

Here’s the game, containing a variation in an opening you don’t see in top flight chess these days. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1027914.

Everything is open to interpretation, so make of it what you will. It looks to me like there is a serious gulf in class here. This appears to be substanitated by their results.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1039530

A blow for us English but not an unexpected one.

MJM, Colombia

Take a look at this:

As it stands the world’s number 1 and 2 are Carlsen and Nakamura, with the latter following the former by also announcing a baby is on the way next year. Click on the following link for further information (you may find the video interesting also!): https://www.chess.com/news/view/hikaru-nakamura-expecting-first-child-with-wife-atousa-pourkashiyan

Two months previously, this broke: https://www.chess.com/news/view/magnus-carlsen-and-wife-ella-victoria-announces-pregnancy

Speaking from experience, I suspect their priorites may change or be altered with chess getting less time than it previously did. A celebration of life itself should always triumph over celebrations achieved in a board game right?

MJM

Fellow Bedfordshire chess players: the only player who emerged from the Bedfordshire league and went on to become a GM was James Plaskett, and thereafter British champion in 1990 in sunny Eastbourne.

But just how good was he whilst still playing in the Beds. league? Well, he did finish second in the British championship in 78, however, that is just a statistic, so can hardly be classified as being heuristic for the average club and county player if drawing direct comparisons is the name of the game. What if I said his rating in the 1979 B.C.F list was 222, of further help? Let’s shift the goalposts somewhat.

In completing Norwood’s spiffing The Chess Traveller’s Quiz Book, I did notice that the very last puzzle comes from one of GM Plaskett’s games; an impressive victory accomplished while he was still playing in the Beds. league at the time. If you fancy it, I suggest you try to solve it, then decide for yourself how graspable it is, or is not! From that you should be able to deduce any disparity in ability there may be between yourself and that of a young Plaskett’s. You should bear in mind it is the very last puzzle of the book thus the hardest, (unsurprisingly, I couldn’t even get the first move right!). It is hoped that such endeavour should offer up some indication of his strength comparatively but do bear in mind this pertains to solving a puzzle, so you know something is afoot in the postion. That said, may I suggest you set aside a good few minutes for this if not more and, perhaps, put the right sort of thinking cap on? I should also add the solution to the puzzle is below.

Solution is below. Please refrain from reaching for it initially as it is somewhat self-defeating. Unhelpful clue -as I found out to my surprise, the first move is not Bxg6!

For further information on the game it should be pointed out that it was played in the European Junior Chess Championship, and that GM Plaskett finished 3rd, behind Soviet Union GM Sergei Dolmotov (2nd) and Dutch GM Jon Van Der Wiel. Some information can be found in the following link. https://www.olimpbase.org/~~V/ind-eicc/eu20b-1979.html?__r=5.8830a57d4c3c59c6d5e85f1c4c551575

NB. Comments placed on this site along the lines of ‘What in the devil’s name was the point in asking me to try and solve that!’ I shall not reply to. Praise along the lines of ‘Ah thanks, so that’s how good one of our own once was while still playing for Bedfordshire’ shall be welcomed.

“The Eleven Home Counties, which are thought in Land Taxes to pay more than their proportion, viz. Surrey with Southwark, Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire, Kent, Essex, Norfolk, and Suffolk, Berks, Bucks, and Oxfordshire.

An Essay upon Ways and Means of Supplying the War, 1695 Charles Davenant

Mark. J. McCready

Colombia

Droidfish draw

This is rather unimpressive and untypical too because of white’s early d5 push and several sub-optimal moves played by white. But I do like that I did play in the spirit of the Dutch and siught counterplay to grab the draw.

Mark. J. McCready

Chapinero, Bogota, Colombia

Reflections 2

DISCLAIMER: as insomniac author of this post, I take no responsibility for any electronic device, laptop or PC blown up by running the game linked below through an engine you have installed.

DATED:

July 2nd 2025

SIGNED:

Look at this position:

White to play. Try for four queens?

It comes from this game https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1064810&kpage=3

The question is not who stands better but what will happen if I run it through an engine -I’m not doing it, I wouldn’t dare.

Marcus -Colombia

Reading and writing go hand in hand, of this we know: both are art forms, that most don’t. An advantage of academia is that you encounter texts which require being read critically and many times over in parts, you therefore develop a natural inclination to return to texts repeatedly in order to increase your understanding of them. This may assist you in establishing the importance of a text or a passage whereas simply reading for pleasure is less, or much less, likely to do so.

Knowing what to read in chess is becoming increasingly more difficult for numerous reasons, one of which being an ever-increasing selection of texts to choose from, not to mention all that pulished online on various types of websites and social media platforms with or without the help of AI.

I don’t wish to cast judgement on such matters but would rather refer to that which I found highly engaging when it was published some sixteen years back. That was the 25th anniversary of New In Chess. We can, I think, argue that which is published in the press is more likely to be of higher quality than that which is posted on the internet, generally speaking. We may also argue that an anthology carries greater prestige than the latest publication, since the author is more selective over the material chosen, opting for that considered to be best by readers, writers, editors and reviewers. Quality, then, takes precedence over that which is current. Since it is possible to be both biased and right, or so I believe, my views on the publication this post is about, is that finding anything better is both a hard task ahead and a good path to go down. I cannot help but recommend it for it contains much first rate journalism -of that you can be sure.

So there you have it. Reticent I am not; so I recommend what I am presently re-reading I do, and believe myself justified in doing so thoroughly I do too…hardly synchronic, happily arranged, hurriedly off with a bang -a damn good read indeed it be!

Nietzsche -Human, all too human

Marcus, Colombia