As a rule of thumb, the more complex the concepts you grapple with are, the better the player you are. By this I mean when you move away from the material to the abstract, it means the more you are absorbing, very generally speaking. If you never consider control over colour complexes, it’s fair to say you are most likely playing for pleasure than playing to push yourself towards becoming a professional player. Those at the very top are able to win by means of controlling colour complexes and here’s a fine example by the first accredited Soviet Grand Master Verlinsky. Yes of course in retrospect we see Botvinnik as being the first but that wasn’t so. And so here is our old Soviet friend, who played without hearing, doing what he does best, showing why he was indeed world class.

The final position before Rauzer resigned. He’s not down on material but all the light squares have been taken away from him. The collapse of his position was like a slow-motion train crash.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1272362

2021

2020 was

135 posts

1258 games online

2B0Y2E0

2020 got struck down by the most irksome of all maladies did it not? I much prefer natural disasters over pandemics personally…hopefully this one will piss off sooner rather than later…

Chesswise 2020 has been my best year ever because I altered my style of play significantly and play much more actively and directly. The principle reasons for that is it was both long overdue and the psychological impact of applying pressure is understated, and significantly so. I think that sub-2000 mistakes are a certainty and aplenty, and if you apply pressure they are inevitable almost. So crack the whip I do in order to watch my opponent fall apart. The real skill comes finding the right moment to do so, and that’s not so easy, anyway…

With our offline lives being rendered irrelevant almost, I spent the last 6 months almost online at all times and played some 1000-1500 games, which helped solidify that shift in style to something I am proud of. If every cloud does have a silver lining, then you could argue the sense of occasion which was lost when OTB chess stopped made much more room for a ‘play to win’ mentality to emerge. An altered mindset emerged from which I pushed home all the way, and with chess theory now creeping back into the fray, since the calibre of my opponents is noticeably higher, I should reach my peak next year, and that is where the climb begins…

Yes, most probably if I applied myself solidly for five years I could reach FM level or be thereabouts but I don’t think I will give it all that. Getting over 2000 should suffice methinks…

Do enjoy 2021…

Olcmarcus

If your numbers are on the up and my grade is ‘improving’, as some would say, does that constitute progression or regression? Perhaps the question is a little vague and requires further qualification: what if I become concerned about my actual rating -which admittedly is artificially low- does wanting an impressive rating rank higher than playing contently with no real care over results? Do we start with what lies within us and work outwards or begin with what lies external to us -and depending upon the interpretation of that- work inwards to establish our own thoughts and feelings? Who calls the shots?

Patriotism

Contemporaneous hypermodernism laudible not meretricious for the simpatico.

When general principles are refuted by the counter-intuitive, it becomes tough to remain precise.

The window shopper I once was went and bought the below a mere thirty two years ago

That be King Arthur that be.

Some sentiment be…

Sometimes I play chess without the right thinking cap on.

Apologies for the somewhat pretentious title. Carpe Diem refers to seizing the moment and the question particle ‘na’ is both informal and something used in speech in the Thai language. But who in their right mind thinks that below is worth illustrating? Titillation aside, what could the motive possibly be for showing this chess porn? It comes form a side line in the Vienna Gambit. And what on earth could be gained from studying this? This is one example where chess theory is best abandoned.