Archive for the ‘History of Bedfordshire Chess from 1920-1940’ Category

It does appear that in the early days of the SCCU we were somewhat out of our depth.

Read Full Post »

It does need to be pointed out that the county then was not what it is today. There was a very clear north/south divide which would have reflected on team selection. I can confirm that the entirety of the top half of the team (including co-authors of Chess in Bedfordshire) is from the south of the county, the bottom half I cannot comment on. Additionally, take for example the quotation from the same 1926 BCM but earlier in the year.

Read Full Post »

As difficult as it may be, please note that Bedfordshire is referred to as ‘plucky’. The choice of word is based on results, this being our best so far apparently. Bedfordshire was in the process of putting itself on the map still, having only joined the SCCU 4 years previously, and still continuing to attract some of the best players in the world to the county for simuls and talks. You would have thought if strength and depth had beeen there, it would have been reflected in county results, which is not the case as yet.

Read Full Post »

Bedfordshire suffers a heavy loss to holders Hampshire.

The year is 1928

Read Full Post »

On Adrian Elwin’s site about Beds. chess, you may find a list of previous county champions here, Previous County Champions. Evidence that S. Dickens did indeed become county champion in 1927 and 1928 is corroborated below.

Read Full Post »

Nothing is said in the BCM about the nature of this match. Northampton joined the Beds. league in the 80s it is often thought. There is no evidence of this happening before then. Furthermore, the Beds. league retained its north/south divide until the mid 50s, which practically rules out the possibility of this being a league match, and is instead a friendly.

The date of the match is December 10th 1928

Read Full Post »

Details below can be found concerning a SCCU match between Bedfordshire and neighbouring Hertfordshire. The match is dated December 3rd 1928.

Read Full Post »

“Truth is what your contemporaries let you get away with.” -Richard Rorty

Fellow chess players of Bedfordshire, in returning to Chess in Bedfordshire (F. Dickens & G. L. White: Leeds Whitehead & Miller 1933) once again, courtesy of ineluctable ongoing research, please allow me to draw attention less so to the quote above and more so to the once documented county debut defeat of ours in the S. C. C. U, with special attention paid to a certain individual in particular, since none at all was in the aforementioned publication. First, a recap of the result:

Somewhat aside: chess history is not always as laudable as some readers may think, with authors not being seen as paragons of virtue by all, especially postmodernists or historiographers who may continuously connect interpreting meaning to establishing significance amongst many other things; and so to understand the nature of this defeat, let us ponder over some rather helpful commentary on the match found in The British Chess Magazine, before an examination of Middlesex‘s top three boards, which in fact proves a gulf in class at the top end of the teams, and in all probability, one that trickled down to the lower boards too, thus a principle determining factor in this disconcerting defeat on our debut.

Their Board 1

Fellow county chess players, you may already be acquainted with their top board: the esteemed P. W. Sargeant, him being the author of the then future publication A century of British chess (1934). The estimated rating attributed to him by the EDO Historical Chess Ratings website (not entirely reliable but good enough) at the time of the match was 2115 http://www.edochess.ca/players/p4038.html but it should be pointed out, however, that he was the Middlesex county champion of 1921, two years previously.

Their Board 2

On board two was R. C. Griffith. British champion in 1912 in his only such appearance, and as can be seen above, champion of Middlesex some two years after that. Impressive indeed for a board number two. The EDO website has him estimated at 2261 that year http://www.edochess.ca/players/p4615.html.

Their Board 3

And so board three, thee board three, he who this post is about -and hardly surprising too, the Canadian Maurice Fox. The EDO website has him rated at 2341 the year Bedfordshire was beaten. http://www.edochess.ca/players/p7358.html.

More significantly: four years before he beat our F. Dickens, he outfoxed future world champion Capablanca in a simul with the black pieces, https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1328964, suggesting that he was too strong to play on board three at county level despite Capablanca not being at his optimal best.

According to various sources, later in 1923 he emigrated to Canada. The following year he faced another future world champion with the black pieces, this time Alekhine in a simul in Toronto. During the middlegame, increduously, he decided to march his king down to e3 even though Alekhine still had a queen, rook and knight on the board; sacrificing a rook and a knight along the way and leaving Alekhine the option of allowing himself to be mated instantly or force perpetual check instead! See below. https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1012317

He then went on to win the national championships in Canada a joint record eight times (joint with GM Yanofsky), with his estimated rating peaking in 1929 to 2364. Much more impressively, in the 1950s he not only outfoxed yet another future world champion with the black pieces but beat him too, a certain Robert. J. Fischer https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1044029.

According to the following link, this game occured at the very first Canadian Open, in Montreal 1956 https://www.bcchesshistory.com/canop5662.html and even though Fischer was only 13 at the time with a rating as low as 2156, he could be hardly be classified as a push over given that at the very same age he played what was called the game of the century against Donald Byrne, thus described by Hans Kmoch ‘The following game, a stunning masterpiece of combination play performed by a boy of 13 against a formidable opponent, matches the finest on record in the history of chess prodigies.” Here is the game in case you have forgotten it https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1008361.

Shifting the focus homeward bound, how did our top three stand in relation? In terms of estimated ratings, there is little to go on.

Our board 1

W. Church of Luton (no results attainable, no rating estimated)

Our board 2

H. T. Duhan (of Bedford: estimated rated 2141, 12 years previously) http://www.edochess.ca/players/p12485.html

Our board 3

F. Dickens (of Dunstable & Luton: no results attainable, no rating estimated: aside please note for our purposes, he played alongside Nigel Staddon’s father for many years).

Do also note that the co-authors of Chess in Bedfordshire (F.Dickens & G.L White: Leeds Whitehead & Miller 1933) are playing on boards 3 and 13, and H. T Duhan (our board 2) had already become champion of South Africa eight years after The Boer War had ended in 1910, as has been documented on this site, and also S.Dickens, who drew on board 12 once turned over Tartakower in a simul in Luton in 1928 (also documented on this site).

‘Bedfordshire received its baptism in S.C.C.U matches when Middlesex were (that’s a collective noun and so should be followed by was not were: subject and verb disagreement) encountered at Australia House on February 17th 1823′. Oh really? Baptism of fire was a more aptly chosen term I would say. Their board trois beat deux of, and drew with un of, those always in the top dix greatest players of all time! No wonder we were trounced on those top boards: of those playing lower down the order, the evidence is too depressing to investigate further, and I am too wounded to conduct it!

…if it’s any consolation, I am quite sure that was the only time we faced a county whose board three racked up wins against Capablanca and Fischer, and drew with Alekhine! And should it be the case that once more evidence becomes apparent in retrospect, of us losing heavily to counties fielding players below top board so fiendishly strong that they make beating some of the greatest players of all time with the black pieces look like a doddle, I shall be the first to write a letter of complaint -simul or no simul involved!

A consolation of sorts

Last, but by no means least, another perspective: regarding county players who have beaten future world champions with the black pieces, the all-time score between Middlesex and Bedfordshire is most probably 1-1. If, and only if, it is true that Fox is their only player to do so, and GM Plaskett is ours (he beat Anand before he became world champion) that is. And on that note -draw agreed! https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1018022.

“The world does not speak. Only we do. The world can, once we have programmed ourselves with a language, cause us to hold beliefs. But it cannot propose a language for us to speak. Only other human beings can do that. ”
― Richard Rorty

Mark. J. McCready

Read Full Post »

Old Tom Sweby, so he got beaten up by Oswald Mosley’s henchmen did he? One of the reds in Beds. went down against the black shirts then? Having spent what must be hundreds of hours documenting his column and correcting his frequent mistakes already-I can’t say I will be losing any sleep over that! 🙂

Side note I have spoken to one of his former pupils, a subject of his reportage countless times over, a noted author who knew him, and also reflected upon the comments & messages from a county player who was both his and my team mate many, many, many times over, as well as reflected upon how he presented himself to me in my youth: the consensus being without doubt Tom went after them, or if you like, threw the first punch!

What the reportage says the thing is with old Tom, you can never be sure if he’s correct or not as it is sometimes not the case. The reportage below does indeed show that there was trouble but it suggests he may have been a victim rather than a perpetrator. We may also concede that since Tom reported it himself, that suggests he probably didn’t cause the trouble in the first place because if he had, he’d be much less likely to tell anyone especially when he got beaten up for doing it!

McCready’s last words despite his honorable intentions and ever-lasting attempts to generate interest in chess locally, Tom was not exactly a well-rounded person and had a tendency to be forthright and shoot his mouth off when he saw fit -as I myself witnessed. There is clearly a hidden agenda in play here also as he was a known communist thus opposed to facism as a result of his own views. Many have seen him become vociferous when he didn’t like something (myself included), he even brought Luton chess club to a grinding halt one evening with some overblown tirade just because its members weren’t giving him enough stories to report on -I should know, I was a member of the club then! Given that history does have a tendency to repeat itself, in all probability, given the nature of his reported position when Mosley rolled into town, he went and shot his mouth off to the wrong people and got done over!

Poor old Tom, did he not know learning to control your emotions is advantageous?

Mark. J. McCready

Read Full Post »

When you are up against stiff opposition, it’s not usually a good idea to field a weakened side! Especially when they have future Dunstable based J. M. Craddock on their team!

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »