Karpov was one of the all time best at bamboozling opponents with quiet moves that seemed relatively harmless, only to prove that they weren’t. The move below is one of my favourites of his. Most opponent’s would think something like ‘he thinks Nf4 is coming maybe he’ll play g3, he can’t move another piece backwards, surely?.’

Karpov plays 36. Bf1 here.

I have studied this game at great depth many times over the years. You can find it here: https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1022951

It’s in Karpov’s first publication of his games, although I have to say his analysis of it could have been more extensive. However, the depth of positional understanding in play by Karpov is so great, his opponent never stood a chance. Have a good look at 19. a3 if you don’t believe me. Play through it and ask yourself how an attack with a lone knight and a couple of pawns against 2 knights, 2 rooks, and a queen, as is the case after 37. Nc7 can succeed and why. That’s Karpov there or thereabouts at his best in my opinion. Poor old Bagairov.

MJM

I prefer not to allow my opponent’s pawns to queen, so the move below I could not play. Black wants a rook on e8, that I get. Control over key diagonals too but does white have to be so accomodating? Looks good for white in terms of initiative but defendable for black after going a rook up. Appears to require a transfer of advantage by white of sorts.

Shirov stuns Kramnik with 21. …Qb6!

As if anyone could see that coming. The chances of that are much lower than the next world champion being told he’s got a bun in the oven before being crowned in the closing ceremony. Here’s the game anyway: https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1266208

Regarding this game, again refer to a favoured publication of mine.

Mark. J. McCready

Stiff upper lip in play here: what one Englishman can do, another cannot. McShane won a brilliancy prize for this game and violated an accepted endgame principle with the move below; that being move your king towards your pawns in the endgame, not away from them.

McShane played here 43. …Kh7

The reason for this move is to bring the bishop to g7. Alas, I am not good enough to evaluate correctly if this counter-intuitive looking move is playable as it also costs black material immediately. Given that Nakamura’s following move looked very logical but was also frowned upon by the engines, and soon followed by resignation, no wonder I couldn’t see how strong that move McShane played is. The game is a true classic, as mos twhich win brilliancy prizes are, but tough indeed to work through all the tactics…super tough actually.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1565814

Mark. J. McCready

I feel obliged to show my all time favourite move. Has there ever been a braver move played? Commentating live, Evgenij Miroshnichenko called the game a masterpiece. I’ve never seen anything like it.

Who could play 19. 0-0-0 here?

Probably my all time favourite game courtesy of this move. Against Giri of all opponents also.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1956850

MJM near the equator

In this game someone got thwacked and it wasn’t Tiviakov. But much to his credit, his opponent did manage to soldier on for another 33 moves after the devasting move revealed below.

The bombshell dropped by Tiviakov was 39. …Rxf3

Even if I had 430985723409853659867230498750239457 minutes left on the clock, I couldn’t find that! The game can be found here: https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1369212

Again, with regards to this game, I refer to the publication I bought in 2012, just before my daughter was born.

MJM Latin America

Here’s another move I couldn’t play. Saccing a rook for a strong attack is above me. I would want to be certain it initiates a winning attack, otherwise I wouldn’t do it. But that is what the move below prefaces impressively indeed.

Bareev plays 15 Bh7+ here.

I would not feel threatened by that if it were played against me. However, black’s position soon becomes unenviable, then lost completely thereafter. All way above my level -I’m not good enough to think that if something looks like an innocuous check then it isn’t that – as it wouldn’t be played if that’s all it were.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1458883

For in depth analysis of this game, may I suggest the following purchase?

MJM South America

Reflections 5

MJM

This game I recently discover via research conducted a month or so back. The game is from a simul, where the play is often more gung-ho. That still, you have to admire Fox for threatening mate in 1 given his king position against former Russian champion, and soon to be world champion Alekhine.

Here Fox plays 29. … Qxa2.

I neither have the bravery nor the calculation skills to play such a move.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1012317

MJM Colombia

Lautier was right up there in his day and beat everyone. The manner in which he beat Kasparov in the game below shows just how strong he was. In the diagram below, he plays a move I most certainly couldn’t.

Here Lautier plays 16. … dxc3

You need to play through the game to appreciate its finesse. It does need to be asked if anyone ever had two queens on the board against Kasparov faster than Lautier did. I doubt it very much.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1070708

MJM, Colombia

I can’t link this game, you may find it on Chessbase however.

That is not a move I could play. Where is the win coming from? What’s so wrong with 10. Bf3?

This game is analyzed extensively in the following publication. Well worth purchasing.

MJM, Colombia